photo of Wikipedia Downgrades CNET’s Trustworthiness Over AI-Generated Content

Wikipedia Downgrades CNET’s Trustworthiness Over AI-Generated Content

Exploring the Impact of AI on Journalism and Media Trustworthiness


Recently, Wikipedia downgraded the reliability rating of CNET, a well-known tech news outlet, due to concerns about the accuracy of its AI-generated content. This decision has sparked a broader conversation within the digital media and online community about how AI is reshaping journalism and the importance of transparency when using automated tools to produce articles.

CNET’s AI Experiment and the Fallout

In November 2022, CNET began publishing articles created by artificial intelligence, with content attributed to the byline “CNET Money Staff.” While this move aimed to streamline content production, it quickly backfired as the AI-generated articles were found to contain a variety of mistakes—ranging from factual inaccuracies to plagiarism.


The revelation came to light in early 2023, when Futurism, a tech news site, exposed the extent of the errors. Following the criticism, CNET decided to pause its use of AI for content creation, but the reputational damage had already been done.

Wikipedia’s Response: Downgrading CNET’s Reliability

Wikipedia maintains a page called "Reliable Sources/Perennial Sources," which evaluates the trustworthiness of various media outlets. After the issues with CNET’s AI-generated content came to light, Wikipedia editors opened a discussion about the site’s reliability.


One of the key points raised was that the AI-written articles were filled with errors, leading to concerns over whether CNET could still be considered a reliable source for information. As a result, CNET’s reliability rating on Wikipedia has been revised, with the site now being classified as "generally unreliable" for content published after November 2022.

The Three Periods of CNET’s Reliability Rating

Wikipedia’s updated chart divides CNET’s reliability rating into three distinct periods:


  1. Before October 2020: CNET was considered a reliable source.
  2. October 2020 to October 2022: After being acquired by Red Ventures, CNET’s editorial standards were perceived to decline, leading to ambiguity about its trustworthiness.
  3. November 2022 to Present: Due to the use of AI-generated content that was riddled with factual errors and affiliate links, CNET is now viewed as generally unreliable.

The Broader Debate Over Red Ventures-Owned Sites

The controversy surrounding CNET’s AI-generated content also raised concerns about other websites owned by Red Ventures, including Bankrate and CreditCards.com. These sites had also started using AI-generated content around the same time, which led to further skepticism about the company’s editorial practices.


Critics argued that Red Ventures was not transparent enough about how and where AI was being used, which further eroded trust in its publications. Transparency in AI usage is now seen as a key factor in maintaining credibility.

CNET’s Response to the Backlash

In response to the downgrade and the ongoing debate, CNET issued a statement defending its editorial standards. A company spokesperson clarified that CNET is no longer using AI to generate new content and that any future AI initiatives would follow the site’s publicly available AI policy.


Despite this, the reputational damage caused by the AI experiment continues to impact CNET’s credibility, reflecting the growing concerns over AI’s role in journalism.

The Impact of AI on Journalism

The controversy surrounding CNET highlights a larger issue: the growing use of artificial intelligence in content creation and its potential impact on journalism. As more media outlets experiment with AI tools to produce articles, maintaining editorial integrity and transparency will be crucial for preserving public trust.


The debate also serves as a reminder that AI-generated content must be carefully managed to avoid errors and uphold journalistic standards. As AI continues to evolve, media outlets will need to ensure that their audience is informed about the methods used to create the content they consume.

Final Words

The downgrade of CNET’s reliability rating by Wikipedia marks a significant moment in the ongoing discussion about AI and journalism. As AI technology becomes more integrated into media operations, it’s clear that transparency, accuracy, and editorial oversight will be essential to maintaining trust with readers. The situation serves as a cautionary tale for other media organizations looking to adopt AI in their content creation processes.